Why is the legal standard for Hillary different than the one for you and me?

Hillary Clinton will never “face the dock,” as lawyers are prone to say. But Harold T. Martin III will.
On Thursday, when federal prosecutors announced charges against Martin under the Espionage Act for mishandling classified documents, people wondered, “but what about Hillary Clinton?”
Fair question.
In principle, both did the same thing. Martin, as a National Security Agency contractor, stored classified documents in his home, which was unauthorized. Clinton, as Secretary of State, stored classified documents on her personal server in her home. Again, unauthorized. On its face, it seems pretty much the same.

Legally, the big difference is this: Martin admitted he knew the documents were classified and admitted that what he did was wrong and illegal. Game over.

He should have “lawyered up” before opening his mouth. Or consulted Clinton.

more...>http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/...or-and-me.html

Well, no they didn't do the same thing. The cases are so different in scope, intent, and topic that its absurd to bring them up together.

The process of law was completed. She wasn't found to be suspected of anything that warranted indictment.

Get over it.

BKB

Both possessed “top secret” documents that could harm America if stolen or otherwise exposed. For example, Martin kept at his home “specific operational plans against a known enemy of the U.S.”, say prosecutors. But so did Clinton.

She kept on her home server the location of planned drone strikes on enemies overseas and several other operational plans that were supposed to be kept top secret.

Her emails contained the location of North Korea’s nuclear facilities, transcripts of conversations between foreign intelligence agents, and the names of undercover CIA operatives whose lives could be endangered if revealed.

So both Clinton and Martin are guilty of jeopardizing national security

If you don't believe the nation's top law enforcement people at both the Justice Department and the FBI, then there ain't nothing I can say to you that will change your mind.

And if you believe that strongly that all of those fuckers are in on some conspiracy, then Hillary is the least of our country's problems.

BKb

I'm with AirBud.
It's all rigged....

Better hide your guns.

Better yet, buy more 22 ammo!

BKB

Here it is AirBud...
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/emb...0jk_uxNc?rel=0

Here's your answer AirBud.
When James Comey decided not to indict Hillary Clinton, the whole American public was shocked. Everyone expected him to charge Hillary. However, now we now the real reason why Comey didn't charge Hillary.

His personal and professional relationships - all undisclosed as he announced the Bureau would not prosecute Clinton - reinforce bipartisan concerns that he may have politicized the criminal probe.

These concerns focus on millions of dollars that Comey accepted from a Clinton Foundation defense contractor, Comey's former membership on a Clinton Foundation corporate partner's board, and his surprising financial relationship with his brother Peter Comey, who works at the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation's taxes.

Comey earned $6 million in one year alone from Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin became a Clinton Foundation donor that very year.

According to records, Lockheed Martin is also a member of the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt, which paid Bill Clinton $250,000 to deliver a speech in 2010.

In 2010, Lockheed Martin won 17 approvals for private contracts from the Hillary Clinton State Department.

In 2013, Comey became a board member, a director, and a Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee member of the London bank HSBC Holdings

When our source called the Chinatown offices of D.C. law firm DLA Piper and asked for "Peter Comey," a receptionist immediately put him through to Comey's direct line. But Peter Comey is not featured on the DLA Piper website.

Peter Comey serves as "Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas" for DLA Piper. James Comey was not questioned about his relationship with Peter Comey in his confirmation hearing.

DLA Piper is the firm that performed the independent audit of the Clinton Foundation in November during Clinton-World's first big push to put the email scandal behind them. DLA Piper's employees taken as a whole represent a major Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign donation bloc and Clinton Foundation donation base.

DLA Piper ranks #5 on Hillary Clinton's all-time career Top Contributors list, just ahead of Goldman Sachs.
And here is another thing: Peter Comey has a mortgage on his house that is owned by his brother James Comey, the FBI director.
Trickle-down corruption.

When President Obama nominated Comey to become FBI director in 2013, Comey promised the United States Senate that he would recuse himself on all cases involving former employers.
He lied. He has in fact politicized the FBI- that is supposed to support the Rule of Law.

The FBI's investigation of Hillary Clinton needs to be re-opened, Comey and Attorney General Loretta Lynch should recuse themselves and Congress should demand the appointment of a Special Prosecutor.

As you can see, Hillary is tightly connected to Comey.

If you still didn't know why Hillary wasn't indicted, now you know!

Them some crooked mofo's

Yep.
I'm more worried about what HILLARY does than I am about what Trump says.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BarryBobPosthole

If you don't believe the nation's top law enforcement people at both the Justice Department and the FBI, then there ain't nothing I can say to you that will change your mind.

And if you believe that strongly that all of those fuckers are in on some conspiracy, then Hillary is the least of our country's problems.

BKb

---

Dude, The Director of the FBI stood in front of the nation and said she DID DO what Clinton said she DID NOT DO. The fact that no charges were brought is because it was Clinton.

is there a statute of limitations on shit like this?......I would love to see her go to jail before I die.