This is another interesting development. A homeless shelter in Boston had a “small cluster of cases” so they tested all 397 occupants and 146 tested positive. Strange thing is, not a single one of them had shown any symptoms.
So how many of the “essential” workers that are out stocking your food among other things are positive for this and are asymptomatic?
https://www.actionnewsjax.com/news/t...outputType=amp
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Never try to fight an Old Dude. If you win, there's no glory; if you lose, your reputation is shot."
And that’s the rub isn’t it? At a minimum every cop, fireman, emt, doctor nurse,healthcare worker, school employee, anyone who prepares or serves food and drink, preacher, city employee, and so on has to be tested. And like WV, every nursing home resident and employee needsto be tested. And all those people need followup tests every so often too.Originally Posted by DeputyDog
This policy of only testing people with symptoms creates misleading data.
And the states must do this and they need help. Which is what the Dems are holding out for in this PPP bill. We need to fund what we have to do to get back to business safely before we pass another payday loan bill.
If you have a leak in your gas tank how many times do you refill it before you fix the damn leak? Same deal here. its no big mysterious deal.
If you are against that, you’re against people going back to work.
BKB
Viva Renaldo!
Another interesting point is all the “assumed” deaths.... not tested, just died of respiratory or other covid related symptom(s).
Perhaps not a big deal, but if you look on the CDC website, the estimated number of deaths for the FLU are anywhere between 4000, and 10,000 per month (their estimate is a wide range)
Who’s to say up to 10,000 of the “covid” deaths aren’t the flu?
Or pneumonia for that matter.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote