Not going into some long diatribe here. But I want to make a point about something before it ends up on Page 20 of the paper.

There are some very normal people at some other hunting sites that I frequent, and some of them are putting forth some pretty good 'evidence', circumstantial as it is, about some pretty gross anomalies about Sandy Hook. They are viewing some videos of past news casts, many where the police are giving briefings.

Quite a few things don't add up. The difference today is that technology exists to retain those broadcasts on Youtube and elsewhere on the Internet (that bad example of truth that Al Gore invented). So there's no wild opinions based on history-revision, the videos are clearly viewable and smart people are observing some things.

Again, not going into all of it, but some of them are things like...........there was no indication originally that Lanza had a rifle, just pistols........the only rifle mentioned was video'ed and pulled from his trunk, and it has a wood stock.........it appears to be a Ruger 10/22, not an AR........There was original police scanner recordings that a 2nd shooter ran to the woods.......

Some discrepancies are likely, the original confusion dictates that, most likely. But some of this is pretty head-scratching. I know they said they'd go slowly, and produce a detailed report. But will WE ever get to see/read it?

I remember 9/11, and how so many crazy theories came out not long after, none matching the reality that I saw.
I remember the Iraq War discussions, the UN, and how many people later seemed to have forgotten how almost complete was the national support, in Congress and elsewhere. (Most now think W rammed that war down our throats).

I give that example solely to point out that I don't want this one to result in some great national shift in culture based on lies. If we need to change, let's change sensibly. But let's not decide to kill all dogs because dogs cause cancer, when in fact it's cats, and only some of them, some of the time.