Bullshit. Pure 100% bulla sheeta.
How are one loss teams ranked ahed of unbeatens? Somebody splain that.
BKB
Bullshit. Pure 100% bulla sheeta.
How are one loss teams ranked ahed of unbeatens? Somebody splain that.
BKB
I don't know the specifics. But, I guess it's about who you've played and who you lost to. It's only week one. Relax.
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." Raoul Duke
Oh I know its early. And that's exactly the point. If they screw it up this early, they'll screw it up later. The playoff advocates all said this bllshit wouldn't happen once we got rid of the BCS.
They lied I reckon.
BKB
It's Paul Finebaums fault
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones"
Albert Einstein
Pretty simple, Phole....the committee said at the onset that "strength of schedule and quality of wins and losses" were their #1 criteria....contrary to all the AP, Coach's, and ESPN polls, that's the very reason the committee dropped Ohio State down to #3....they seem to be using a common sense approach, unlike the commentators, pollsters, bookies, and money grabbers who consistently drool and slobber over sub-Urban and Ohio State.
Ohio State hasn't played a single top 25 team, and won't, until they play both Mich. and Mich. State....and, I firmly believe that one, or even both of them, will pull off an upset.
Just wait until this weekend is over....you'll see them change a buncha sheeit....#2 LSU at #4 Bama for instance....a Bama loss will send them to pergatory and prolly the Toilet Bowl....and, what if Ark. upsets Ole Piss, like they did, last year???....Lord knows, I hope that happens!!!
Last edited by Big Muddy; 11-04-2015 at 01:33 PM.
Southern Gentleman
Just look at the NCAA Basketball Tournament. Somebody is always gonna get screwed no matter how many teams you let in. Before, we were arguing about which two. Now, we're arguing about which 4. Once they expand it to eight, and they will, we'll be arguing about that. From the NCAA's perspective, that's probably a good thing.
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." Raoul Duke
Paul Finebaums is on the SEC network supposedly an authority on all things SEC. Big Bama homer
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones"
Albert Einstein
Apparently playing East Popcorn State doesn't in non conference doesn't affect your rankings. And neither does losing. There's not a nickel's worth of difference in the top ten or twelve's non conference schedules, but yet there's unbeatens ranked below one loss teams. I don't think that's right.
My opinion, FWIW, is that if you're trying to predict now who might end up in the final four you might end up with something close to this list. But if you're ranking teams on their body of work up to now, you'd have a different list. I think the latter is the way they should rank them, not the former.
BKB
Yeah, but us getting fired up about it in early November, clicking on links and watching games because of it is their entire point. So, I say they've got the exact system they want.
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." Raoul Duke
Phole, surely you aren't saying that 8-0 Houston should be ranked higher than 7-1 Bama or 7-1 Stanford, just on the basis of their records.
Southern Gentleman
Well, yes. For this early in the season I would. If its as they say, and strength of schedules and stuff will eventually lead us to the best teams, then it might work out where that'd be the case. What weight does wins and losses carry in the selection that its outweighed by what conference they are in?
If you look at who they've played and won/lost to, Is there really that much difference in the teams they've played? Bama might carry a slight edge there but not enough to overcome their loss this early in the season. By the end of the season, it will assuredly be different and there's no doubt that Bama is a better team. But there's no rationale in the published rules to take the sunjective into account.
That is, unless you take all the AP and USA Today rankings up to now into account.
My point is, its still a mythical national championship.
And all this talk was BS.
BKB
If we all threw our problems in a pile, and you saw everyone else's problems-- you'd take yours back.
I have more hair than that guy.
BKB
After ole miss decimates the hogs this weekend, they'll drop for not beating us worse thus causing Alabama's loss to the rebel black bears look worse and drop them out of the top ten.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones"
Albert Einstein
QA, remember last year???....let's pray it happens, again!!!
Southern Gentleman
Phole, you keep saying, "It's too early in the season for this bs"....day'um, the season is 75% over with....only four games left in the regular season.
Southern Gentleman
1) LSU
2) Bama
3) Florida
4) Georgia
5) South Carolina
6) Tennessee
7) Kentucky
8) Auburn
9) Missouri
10) Vanderbilt
I would have listed Arkansas but I didn't want to look like a SEC whore
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones"
Albert Einstein
Ha! One potential scenario I saw had the SEC getting shutout. Very unlikely, but that would be a hoot for the rest of the country!
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." Raoul Duke
HA, let the envious haters hate!!!
Southern Gentleman
Based on all this logic, Iowa has got to feel like they've been really screwed over.
Who is this stranger?
"Never try to fight an Old Dude. If you win, there's no glory; if you lose, your reputation is shot."
While #9 isn't bad.... They have just as many quality wins as Alabama and are undefeated. Just don't see how Alabama got to #4. Makes 0 sense to me. Hell, Florida beat Ole Miss and had their loss on the road against LSU. Why aren't they above Alabama? It will be interesting to see how they continue the shuffling.
WARNING - Due to the rising costs of ammunition, warning shots will no longer be given.